Agreementwith Dr Snow Case
Inthe reading, the author examines the deadly epidemic of the cholerain the Soho District of West London. The crisis was devastating interms of spread and the time it happened. The author explores thecritical nature of the August 1854 epidemic in terms of the speed ofspread and the fatalities. According to the author, the epidemic had56 cases in a day and 87 new cases within the first 24 hours with 70mortalities (Smith and Bottcher 150). However, the crisis was solvedby the discovery of the cause and fatality distribution of thewaterborne disease by a maverick Doctor John Snow. The main idea ofthe author is to show the importance of unconventional ideas, throughthe description of the role of Dr. Snow in solving the deadly puzzle.
Iagree with the author’s presentation that solutions to some crisisrequire the use of unconventional ideas and resilience. This isbecause experts who tend to have unconventional solutions or ideasmay have the right and most speedy solutions to difficult situations.However, these solutions are mainly rejected because they challengethe status quo and the comfort of the conventional ideas. Forexample, in the Soho epidemic, the medical authorities did notconsult the Doctor Snow, who had over time expressed his knowledgeand research on the problem before (Hampel 46). After collecting therelevant facts about the disease and the cases of the victims, hepresented the findings to the Board of Guardians of St. James Parish,without fear from the past rejections.
Theauthor is appropriate to focus his argument on the solution that Dr.Snow gave to solve the crisis. The importance of his unconventionalideas was vindicated by the facts that arose from the doctor’ssolution to the deadly Soho epidemic. The description of the Broadand Cambridge streets case by the author presents a good scene toexpress his idea of the maverick expertise of Dr. Snow. I agree withthe author’s presentation of the importance of efforts in solvingsuch problems. For example, Dr. Snow made expert efforts to examinethe distribution of the deaths from the region and came out with thefacts. The facts that he gathered from his own efforts proved hisargument and theory right.
Inaddition, I agree with the author in depicting Dr. Snow as the onewho had the right expertise and ability to solve the Soho deadlyepidemic. The author portrays the ability to think unconventionallyas an important element of discovery. It is for this reason thatafter explaining the epidemic, the author presents Dr. Snow as amaverick who was known for his unconventional ideas. If Dr. Snow hadnot explored his new argument about the waterborne nature of cholera,the epidemic could have been more deadly that it was (Scrambler285).This presents a case for the importance of the unconventional ideasin the discovery of solutions.
Iagree with the author that solving some puzzles and difficultsituations requires the use of unconventional ideas. The author’sportrayal of the maverick style of Dr. Snow, his resilience and selfbelief on his own conviction proves the argument right. By describingthe deadly puzzle, the author presents the problem that had overcomemedical consultants. However, by discussing the solution by Dr. Snow,the author presents the importance of using unconventional ideas tosolve unfamiliar problems.
Hampel,Sandra. TheStrange Case of the Broad Street Pump: John Snow and the Mystery ofCholera.California: University of California Press, 2006, Print
Scrambler,Graham. Sociologyas Applied to Medicine.London: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2008, Print
Smith,Lorraine and Bottcher,Elizabeth. LongmanAcademic Reading Series 5 Student Book,Volume 5. New York: Pearson Education, Limited, 2013, Print